Comments on: .CO Gets (Free) NASCAR Exposure http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/ Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC. Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:32:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.3 By: Elliot Silver http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-70135 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:07:05 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-70135 @ Mercedes

Your link was removed, sorry.

]]>
By: mercedes service and repair in thousand oaks http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-70134 Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:03:33 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-70134 The “average person” didn’t take to o.co, it was nothing but confusion, hence that failure. That you think people won’t be going to .com out of habit typing .com, is you lacking some basic understanding. Really it is major mistake.

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64886 Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:18:15 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64886 why don’t we have news about this

this weekend ?

.CO Internet take on industry titans .com

http://www.worldfinance.com/markets/co-internet-take-on-industry-titans-com/

]]>
By: Farmer Brown http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64808 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:15:05 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64808 What do you expect that company is based in Springfield, IL. Nobody in Springfield IL knows anything about domains

]]>
By: RAYY http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64776 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:45:49 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64776 Brandt.XXX was taken….don’t know who bought it….

]]>
By: Kevin M. http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64769 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:22:56 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64769 A 2 day blog with 29 replies, and 14 are by ‘one’ poster, and 9 countering/arguing with him. I’m sorry, what was this blog post about again?

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64761 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:22:55 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64761 @joe

sorry, .com is old shoes to me now.

My interests are strictly in

.Co

only.

]]>
By: Joe http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64760 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:16:34 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64760 @Robert

If you’re interested, DomainMessiah is available in both .com and .CO ;)

]]>
By: JamesD http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64759 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:11:23 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64759 Robert, if you genuinely believe what you say, why not just settle back and watch while the rest of us are proven wrong. Then you can come back and remind us all of how right you were…surely that would be more satisfying than what you’re doing now?
BTW, love the way you put yourself up there with Jesus – I’m no shrink but I bet that means something!

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64758 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:07:59 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64758 even Tibetan monks are thumbs up on

.Co , check it out.

http://www.gyuto.co

vs.

http://www.gyuto.com

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64752 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:29:44 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64752 You all can’t show respect

to the world’s shortest

extension .CO I love You!

]]>
By: Devon Sheffield http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64751 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:12:31 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64751 @Robert, I say that .co is an intentionally confusing extension that has been marketed (albeit brilliantly) to a handful of individuals or businesses who either think it’s the new gold rush or feel they suddenly now HAVE to register out of fear of brand confusion, or (more probable) people who have a complete misunderstanding of the hazards of owning a confusing extension. It’s not like .xxx or any other extension. It’s very unique. It’s one freaking character off from it’s big brother, the time-tested, .com. Truth is, if you feel THAT strongly about .co, you wouldn’t have to continually post your viewpoints on it, defending your investments on every other post here. The more likely scenario is that you’d just be quietly making money with all of your .co purchases. The irony is that you keep pushing and pushing .co on a very successful .com blog ran by an owner who invests 99% of his time in nothing but .com’s and continues to do so. There is and will be some money to be made with a .co, so I’ll agree to that. However, your paradigm shift .co extension theory is nothing but fail, I’m afraid. You have the spirit and the preaching tendencies of a Rick Schwartz, but the difference is that I think you might be riding in the wrong investment vehicle.

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64749 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:04:25 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64749 i got u’ll running and hopping now.

]]>
By: Elliot Silver http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64748 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:47:05 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64748 @ Robert Cline

LOL to all of that

]]>
By: Brad Mugford http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64747 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:38:34 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64747 @ Robert

Your “examples” make no sense and your comments frequently ruin blog posts.

What are you trying to show exactly?
That some .CO is developed when the better .COM is not?

Big deal. It has nothing to do with .CO.

I can show developed sites in any extensions where the better .COM is not developed.

Brad

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64746 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:30:07 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64746 call me what you will.

jesus was called a clown at his time too.

But now he is everyone’s savior, son of god.

You too will think of me.

]]>
By: Abdu http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64745 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:47:57 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64745 @Joe

I wonder if each New gTLD registry is going to hire a clown. We’d end up in a Circus Name Industry.

]]>
By: Joe http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64743 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 01:28:10 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64743 Robert Cline may be a clown and all, but the last examples he’s posted represent a real situation: new brands looking for a recognizable domain that don’t want to settle for what is left in .com. The Registry has been leveraging this situation pretty well.

]]>
By: Nadia http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64742 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:51:30 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64742 @ Robert:

Please stop. There’s no reason to post 4 comments in a row. You actually HURT the extension when you do this, because your arguments are invalid and nobody takes you seriously.

]]>
By: Robert Cline http://www.domaininvesting.com/co-gets-nascar-exposure/#comment-64741 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:43:25 +0000 http://www.domaininvesting.com/?p=13423#comment-64741 here’s another one:

http://tekhne.co/

vs

http://tekhne.com

]]>