Using BingItOn.com to Compare EMDs

Using BingItOn.com to Compare EMDs

13

For the last few months, Bing has been asking people to use BingItOn.com to see a side by side comparison of Bing and Google search results. The idea behind the marketing campaign is to get people to see that Bing’s results are more helpful than Google’s.

It’s a neat campaign, and although I don’t plan to switch from Google to Bing, I wanted to see how .com exact match domains (EMD) rank on Bing vs. Googles. For this comparison, I somewhat randomly chose 20 keyword terms (where the .com is developed) and shared the rank of that EMD on Google and Bing for the keyword if it is in the top 10. If not, in the top 10, I listed it is “NR” for no ranking. I did not count news, image, or local results. I always chose the left result so I could tell which is Bing and which is Google.

One reason I think this is interesting is that the search is done for the keyword at the exact same time from the same search location. Presumably, it doesn’t take my past searches into consideration as a normal search would, so theoretically, my search results shouldn’t be skewed by that. It’s also from the same location so local results should theoretically be similar.

Keep a couple important factors in mind when looking through the results of my test. When I checked to see if the EMD is developed, I did not review the content. If the EMD contains mostly copied content (ie doesn’t have unique content or isn’t a full on website), it will likely not rank well in either Google or Bing. The other thing to keep in mind is that this is a snapshot in time from whatever IP address their site uses. It might not be entirely replicable because of constant algorithm tweaks.

Below are my results:

  • Hotels: Google #1 vs. Bing #1
  • Car Insurance: Google #NR vs. Bing #6
  • Used Cars: Google #6 vs. Bing #2
  • Wine: Google #1 vs. Bing #3
  • Movie Tickets: Google #1 vs. Bing #1
  • Pet Food: Google #NR vs. Bing #4
  • Candy: Google #NR vs. Bing #1
  • Halloween Costumes: Google #6 vs. Bing #1
  • SEO: Google #NR vs. Bing #2
  • Domain Names: Google #7 vs. Bing #4
  • Paris Hotels: Google #5 vs. Bing #NR
  • Down Pillows: Google #6 vs. Bing #2
  • Cheesecake: Google #NR vs. Bing #1
  • Foreclosure: Google #5 vs. Bing #1
  • Candles: Google #NR vs. Bing #1
  • Casino: Google #NR vs. Bing #3
  • Picture Frames: Google #1 vs. Bing #1
  • American Flags: Google #3 vs. Bing #1
  • DUI Attorney: Google #3 vs. Bing #4
  • Bobbleheads: Google #1 vs. Bing #1

You are more than welcome to do the BingItOn.com comparison and share where EMDs rank on Bing vs. Google in the comment area of this post.


About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has sold seven figures worth of domain names in the last five years. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest.


Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | | Facebook | Email

Comments (13)

    Greg r

    But since no one uses Bing it doesn’t matter

    March 3rd, 2013 at 12:17 pm

    Jacob

    I just did 5 searches:

    Google
    Google
    Google
    Draw
    Draw

    March 3rd, 2013 at 1:03 pm

    Brad Mugford

    What happened to Candy.com?

    It is #1 on Bing and not ranked on Google. Is it blacklisted or something?

    Brad

    March 3rd, 2013 at 2:36 pm

      Elliot Silver

      Since BingItOn.com only lists the top 10 results, “NR” means it wasn’t listed in the top ten when I searched. I don’t know how it ranks outside of the top 10 or for other keywords.

      March 3rd, 2013 at 2:39 pm

      SS

      Candy.com got whacked hard by Google’s Panda and Penguin update last April/May.

      See below:

      http://www.semrush.com/info/candy.com

      March 3rd, 2013 at 4:14 pm

      Brad Mugford

      Ouch.

      I just searched Google and Candy.com is not in the first 10 pages of search results for me.

      Their FB page is on the bottom of the 5th page.

      Brad

      March 3rd, 2013 at 6:04 pm

    Makon

    What happened to Candy.com?

    No matter how good you are, no matter how hard you try, Google will make sure nobody is the leader in any category so they have to pay for advertising.

    I’ve been saying it for over a decade, “Don’t build your business for Google”. As foolish as that sounds, you have no choice if you want no tethers.

    March 3rd, 2013 at 5:09 pm

      SS

      @ Makon

      There is an algo and quality score for Adwords as well. So if your site doesn’t do well in Google’s search you’ll likely not do well with PPC (ridiculous CPC and lower ad position)

      March 3rd, 2013 at 8:43 pm

    Josh

    Don’t end users buy keyword targetted dot com’s to avoid the google issue, just saying, it is a factor imo..and apparently rightfully so. I have done quite well getting keyword domains for clients and saving them if not hundred’s than millions in google ad fee’s. It pays to buy the best you can if you can, that is why the value is there for highly targeted names.

    March 3rd, 2013 at 8:28 pm

    Louise

    Another cool example of a call to action domain name. More:

    TelltheBell.com
    PlanYourRoadTrip.com

    March 4th, 2013 at 12:52 am

    Donna Mahony

    Bing wins 3 – 5 for me

    March 4th, 2013 at 8:54 am

    Tarik

    Bing wins most of the searches for me. The problem with Google is it can easily be “gamed.” You have to click so many results to find the best stuff. Bing has potential.

    March 4th, 2013 at 11:26 am

    spinxinc

    It’s true that more people are using Google but still Bing has its own importance. EMD attack from Google has affected many sites.

    March 6th, 2013 at 12:03 am

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail *

Website