ICANN Seeking Volunteers for UDRP Review Working Group | DomainInvesting.com

ICANN Seeking Volunteers for UDRP Review Working Group

15

ICANN sent out a news alert yesterday calling for volunteers to participate on a new working group that will be created to “Review all Rights Protections Mechanisms in all generic top-level domains.” Among other things, this working group will be tasked with potentially overhauling the UDRP and URS procedures. This could have major ramifications for domain investors and domain name portfolio operators.

A week ago, Phil Corwin from the Internet Commerce Association wrote an article on CircleID about the importance of this working group and the impact its findings and recommendations may have on domain owners and domain investors. Phil also published an informative blog post about the working group on the ICA’s website. You should read both of these articles to get a better idea of why members of the domain investment community should consider participating on this working group.

Phil also commented to me about the importance in having solid representation among domain investors within this working group:

“These reviews, first of the new gTLD RPMs, followed by the first-ever review of the UDRP, may result in important changes to the treatment of domains within trademark law and ICANN rights protection processes. And those changes, once made, will probably last for at least a decade or two without further alteration. So anyone with an interest in registrant rights and domain valuations has a stake in their outcome.”

Nat Cohen, a board member at the ICA and the founder of Telepathy, Inc. a company that has had to repeatedly defend its descriptive domain name assets in UDRP proceedings, also shared some thoughts with me:

“The UDRP system is badly broken. It is designed for trademark interests, implemented largely by trademark interests for the benefit of trademark interests. Panelists act without accountability and some trample on the policy with impunity. The use of the UDRP to legitimize the theft of domains such as camilla.com, fattuesday.comnicecar.com, ovation.com, canary.com, vanity.com and many others has provoked outrage from domain investors wondering what could be done to protect our investments from an unfair process that is built into every gTLD domain registration.  To quote the lyrics from “Hamilton“-

‘When you got skin in the game, you stay in the game
But you don’t get a win unless you play in the game
…Oh, I’ve got to be in
The room where it happens…’

This is our once in a generation chance to be in the room where the rules that govern our livelihood will be made. Our active involvement will give us the best chance for a good outcome, otherwise we can cry and moan about the results for decades to come.”

People in the domain investment space are encouraged to sign up to participate since trademark interests and other groups will likely have participation in full force. People who volunteer to become a member of the working group should expect to spend approximately one hour per week on the group calls. The group will likely be convened for over a year. For those who wish to take a more passive role, it is possible to sign up for the email list and not be active on the working group.

I do not know how large this group will be, but I plan to sign up for the working group. I encourage others in this business to do so as well to ensure that people who invest in domain names are represented. People often complain that the UDRP is unfair to domain investors and strongly favors trademark and other interests. Now is the time to act to ensure our rights as domain owners are not usurped.

Visit the ICANN website to read more about the working group and to sign up to participate.


About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has sold seven figures worth of domain names in the last five years. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest.


Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | | Facebook | Email

Comments (15)

    Joe Styler

    Thanks for sharing this. I think often people talk less and smile more when action is required. This is your chance to take your shot at shaping this important aspect of the domain industry. I am going to look into it.

    March 22nd, 2016 at 1:01 pm
      In reply to Joe Styler | March 22nd, 2016 at 5:56 pm

      Joe Styler

      And this morning I was thinking of skipping listening to Hamilton again, and then I read this and it was stuck in my head again. :)

      In reply to Nat Cohen | March 22nd, 2016 at 8:19 pm

    Ron

    I agree with all comments above, especially the one with skin in the game.

    This is an important moment in time, to have your say, it could have generational wealth impact for some.

    March 22nd, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    Ian Ingram

    Thanks for the heads up on this. Just signed up to monitor the deliberations. Time permitting, I may just go for the member route which looks to be an easy switch by informing the GNSO Secretariat at any time.

    March 22nd, 2016 at 2:34 pm

    Ariel

    Thanks Elliot, very important indeed. I see it says at a minimum one weekly teleconference. Were you ever in a program like this? If I understand correctly there will be many different focus groups?

    March 22nd, 2016 at 10:54 pm

      Philip Corwin

      @Ariel–This is not a focus group as if for a political candidate or a consumer product. This is a working group (WG) that will review first the new gTLD RPMs and later on the UDRP to evaluate how well they are meeting their goals and to recommend whether any procedural or substantive changes should be made.
      The work of the WG will be organized by a Chair, or more likely several Co-Chairs, in coordination with ICANN Policy support staff. At some points subgroups may be created to focus in on particular issues and then report back to the larger WG, in order to operate more efficiently. But most of the effort will likely be done by the full WG.
      Does that answer your question?

      In reply to Ariel | March 23rd, 2016 at 11:04 am

      Ariel

      ok great, thank you Philip.

      In reply to Philip Corwin | March 23rd, 2016 at 11:15 am

    Ben

    Hello I am interested please do inbox me for details. Cheers!

    March 23rd, 2016 at 9:48 am

    Philip Corwin

    PS–the official Call for Volunteers is at https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-21-en . That’s where interested individuals can sign up.

    March 23rd, 2016 at 11:06 am

    Joseph Peterson

    Most likely, I’ll be participating. Even though I’ve never been affected by any UDRP, it’s important for domain investors (and registrants generally) to assert their interests and legitimacy.

    March 23rd, 2016 at 5:00 pm

      Joe Styler

      Then it will be two of us with the same name on the group :) I think your involvement would be a benefit for all, you’re normally very well reasoned and lucid in your writing.

      In reply to Joseph Peterson | March 23rd, 2016 at 5:04 pm

      Elliot Silver

      Agree and that makes at least 3 :)

      In reply to Joe Styler | March 23rd, 2016 at 5:08 pm

    Salvador Camacho Hernandez

    I totally agree with this Governance exercise regarding the reviewing of the RPM.

    I have already subscribed as a member, because we need to create an equilibrated ecosystem between trademark owners and domainers.

    Best,

    Salvador.

    March 28th, 2016 at 4:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail *

Website