When Buying .org Domain Names | DomainInvesting.com
101 Domain

When Buying .org Domain Names


I am going through a huge list of .org domain names, and I happen to be sitting here with my fiancee (well, she just left when I started blogging). The list of names I am looking at consists of a couple thousand .org names in every vertical, language, tense…etc. My fiancee saw a few good names that I would have bought in a second if they were .com, but I explained to her why I wouldn’t buy them in the .org extension. I am happy to blog about my thoughts as I have been asked before.

I believe .org is a good extension if the name makes sense to be in the .org. Since .org stands for organization, I believe the name should either make sense as an association of the term or as a group of that specific term. While .org doesn’t get as much play with commercial domain names, you can still make a commercial venture out of an organization.

Soccer.org would be a great domain name for a soccerl-related organization. If I owned it, I would build a directory of soccer clubs throughout the country. You could offer teaching tools, organizational tools or other enticements to sign up for the organization. I don’t think a name like Grapes.org would make sense as a .org, because it just doesn’t make sense as an organization.

As far as I know, almost anyone can own or develop any type of domain name, with the exception of .gov, .edu, and some country codes. However, we need to keep in mind that consumers expect certain things from certain extensions. If a consumer navigates to a .gov website, they expect to see something related to and managed by the government. If they navigate to a .edu website, they expect and educational website owned by a school or teaching institution. Likewise, they would expect the .org to be managed by an organization or association related to the actual term in the domain name. This can be a big advantage.

About The Author: Elliot Silver is an Internet entrepreneur and publisher of DomainInvesting.com. Elliot is also the founder and President of Top Notch Domains, LLC, a company that has sold seven figures worth of domain names in the last five years. Please read the DomainInvesting.com Terms of Use page for additional information about the publisher, website comment policy, disclosures, and conflicts of interest.

Reach out to Elliot: Twitter | | Facebook | Email

Comments (14)


    Hi Elliot, hope all is well, I have to agree with most of what’s said but…
    Have to disagree with Grapes.org, related : Winery Association or Organization would probably snatch that up!
    That’s where one person’s garbage is another one’s gold.
    I don’t own too many .Org’s for those same reasons, but if it will fit into the correct category as you mention I’d go for it.



    March 29th, 2008 at 12:07 pm

    John Bomhardt

    I have found with SEO work that I can rank the .org sites higher in search listings than the .com sites. Also the trust factor is higher for people with .org as well. I don’t own much of .org either due to lack of development time.


    March 29th, 2008 at 1:55 pm

    Patrick McDermott


    I get your point about the domain fitting the extension.

    However regarding Grapes.org, I agree with Frank.

    Go to Google and type in “grape growers association”.

    When you see the page upon page results of so many grape grower organizations, I believe you will change your mind.



    Fair enough – I agree with you. But, there are plenty of .org names that don’t make sense.

    March 29th, 2008 at 2:32 pm

    David J Castello

    I wouldn’t touch .org for a commercial venture. You would simply be tossing direct navigation traffic to the .com version. However, .org can very effective for traditional non-profit organizations and it does have a high trust factor for that reason. We have a handful and have yet to buld them out. My favorite is SaltonSea.org (we just have a page up). Preserving the Salton Sea was a pet project of the late Sonny Bono and the topic carries a lot of political weight in the Palm Springs area. We’re looking for an organization to partner with on it.

    March 29th, 2008 at 2:34 pm


    I have to agree with David, unless you are protecting your Brand and/or plan on using it as away of “Giving Back”… or using a revelant subject which in turn still promotes your commercial site.

    Love that SaltonSea.org concept! As well as promoting PalmSprings.com…used as I mentioned above :)

    March 29th, 2008 at 4:53 pm


    People frequently trust .org sites more than .coms if they are looking for advice or information.

    If I was building an information based site (non-transactional) and was going to depend primarily on search traffic I frequently prefer the .org to most two word .coms

    If you are building a site designed to get sell ads for mortgage leads for example would you prefer Mortgage.org or MortgageGuide.com?

    March 29th, 2008 at 10:39 pm


    Soccer would be good for softball ? :-)


    Typo :)

    March 29th, 2008 at 10:41 pm

    Ari Shohat

    I agree with Gordon on the info based sites working well for .org. That’s exactly what I plan to do with sites like Techno.org that I own.

    March 30th, 2008 at 12:25 am


    Hmmm are you hinting i hold on to schoolsoccer.org a tad longer? 😉 was contemplating just yesterday whether to add it to the unload list.


    Personally, if I owned it, I would probably drop it. I’ve found development to be expensive, and I wouldn’t put my resources behind it – although I was a school soccer player through high school!

    March 30th, 2008 at 3:32 am


    HI Elliot:

    Thanks for your blog. It’s always a must read and as much a part of the morning ritual as coffee. Elliot, I was wondering what you think of .org for geo domains?



    Thanks for the compliment – I could use some coffee right now!

    I am really iffy on them. I know when people hear me mention Lowell.com or Salinas.com, they are interested, which makes any discussion much easier. I don’t think you get the same response from the .org. Since development costs would be the same for both, I think you will earn a return much quicker on the .com. If you could get a great geo .org (like NewYork.org or Boston.org) where the .com was unavailable or unattainable, I say go for it.

    March 30th, 2008 at 8:48 am


    I agree with #2 above. Work well with SEO and they are trusted. While I do not own, VisitNewHampshire.org (Elliot’s home state), could the individual who does not develop that into a Visitor’s Guide like VisitCalifornia.org and many other states and cities. Couldn’t they develop and 1) Sell ads 2) and/or add Yahoo or Google Ads 3) Market their restaurants, in addition to providing visitor information 4) Market vacation rentals you may have, in addition to providing visitor information 5) Or marketing an attraction etc. I see potential and value.

    March 30th, 2008 at 9:02 pm



    I think .org is great for a GEO **SITE**.

    But there is a big difference between a name you are going to build a site on, and a name you are going to build a **BUSINESS** on. I have lots of sites, but I have 3 that I consider businesses at this point.

    Sites can make you a lot of money, but if it is something you want to make up business cards for, make sales calls for and that you are thinking of in the long term, then that is when I would worry about the traffic leakage and market confusion that building on a .org would bring.

    If you are spending a few hundred or even a few thousand dollars to build out a site that may make you a few hundred or potentially even thousand per month (usually from search traffic), but that won’t be the focus of your time – then I think .org is a good choice.

    March 30th, 2008 at 10:29 pm


    Yah development is pain in the a$$ and expensive. I am very glad i got the .org name that i got and i am developing it, but if i wasn’t in that industry and didn’t see specific use for .org, i would keep on looking for .com

    March 31st, 2008 at 1:54 am


    Interesting post – you do make a valid point there about .org domain names

    March 31st, 2008 at 11:13 am

Leave a Reply

Name *

Mail *